top of page

Companies go back to work as leaders push back against office activism

Business leaders are drawing a line in the sand when it comes to employee activism disrupting the workplace. Google's recent firing of 28 workers involved in sit-in protests over the company's cloud-computing contract with Israel is a stark example of this shift.


Companies that once encouraged staff to voice their convictions on charged political and social issues are now losing patience with dissent that spills into public view and affects operations. CEOs and boards are increasingly concerned about backlash and getting entangled in partisan politics, as cases like Disney's battle with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Bud Light's boycott have shown.


While ignoring workplace dissent isn't an option, companies are grappling with how to manage squabbling staff on internal platforms over divisive issues. Some, like Google's CEO Sundar Pichai, are making it clear that the office is not a place for political debates or disruptive behavior.


Others, like Coinbase and Meta, have banned certain controversial topics from workplace discussions altogether. Even companies' annual reports are reflecting this caution, with dozens altering or scaling back descriptions of their diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives to avoid legal challenges or political backlash.


For small and medium businesses, navigating this landscape requires a delicate balance. On one hand, SMBs may not have the resources or public profile to weather extended conflicts with activist employees or outside critics. They may need to be even more proactive in setting clear boundaries around acceptable workplace conduct and discourse.


The "Overton Window" is one metric of whether an idea or position is broadly acceptable

On the other hand, SMBs that have built close-knit, values-driven cultures may risk alienating staff if they clamp down too hard on expression. The key is to have consistent policies that align with the company's existing values and business needs, rather than reacting ad hoc to each new controversy. SMBs should also invest in training managers to handle sensitive conversations and provide forums for constructive dialogue, while being prepared to act decisively when behavior crosses a line and disrupts the workplace.


bottom of page